NewYork10021 ( talk) 00:22, (UTC) Numerous editors have doubted or denied that these books can be regarded as reliable sources, the only ones arguing otherwise are the single-purpose accounts belonging to Olsson herself and her relative (and now you as a brand-new user). These issues are being taken to Administrative level and I would not want you dragged into it. HighonaTree, I would be grateful if you would leave this alone now. It became neccessary to put a stop to things before they went too far. This was initiated by someone who has a past pattern of trashing authors he doesn't agree with. It started because not only were resources and citations removed, they were replaced with highly predjudicial and demeaning links. There are about 3 concurrent conversations on this topic at Wikipdeia at the moment. BobGriffin-Nukraya ( talk) 19:27, (UTC) Editing Wars I am myself hoping at some point to discover the viewpoints of the Mar Thoma churches in Kerala, South India, but have been unable to do so yet. Further study on this is being conducted by a number of individuals from various backgrounds, Fida Hassnain among them. The tomb information is, as far as I can tell, unknown in Eastern branches of Christianity, although there are ancient inscriptions indicating their presence in the area. The Roman influenced areas include all Protestant denominations. The Roman influenced areas of Christianity were never informed of Tomb of Jesus related information (or the information was withheld by the Vatican) so it is only really known about in Eastern branches of Christianity and amongst other faiths of the area. Yes this is a hoax: - Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.203 ( talk) 22:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Christianity stub? See the real story behind this fraud: - Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.202 ( talk) 00:27, (UTC) The Jews their friends the Ahmadis are behind the hoax. I'm here in Srinagar now, and plan to find this place tomorrow, if I find out anything new I'll be sure to add it. Str1977 (smile back) 21:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Go for it, that makes sense. This should also solve the problem of this article being a stub. Also, the site is real while the figure of Yuz Asaf and his identification with Jesus is highly questionable. I suggest to move the information contained in Yuz Asaf over here, as this article is fits here better, in the article on the site.
0 kommentar(er)
